Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘trying to punish someone’ in two specific ways

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have faced significant challenges and controversies since stepping down as senior royals. Their decision to leave royal duties, dubbed “Megxit,” resulted in the loss of taxpayer-funded security, prompting Harry to sue the Home Office in 2020. This legal action underscores their ongoing concerns over security, particularly when they visit the UK.

Harry has made several trips back to the UK, such as attending Prince Philip’s funeral and the unveiling of Princess Diana’s statue, but these visits have often been solo. Meghan and their children, Archie and Lilibet, have largely remained in the US, reportedly due to safety concerns. The couple’s focus on security reflects broader tensions with the royal family and the UK establishment.

Kinsey Schofield, a royal expert, suggests that Harry and Meghan’s actions might be perceived as an attempt to “punish” the royal institution and the UK government by publicly challenging their security arrangements. This perspective ties into broader critiques of their post-royal strategy, which some view as a blend of personal grievance and public relations maneuvering.

In the US, Harry and Meghan have been working on building their new brand and life. Meghan recently launched a new brand, American Riviera Orchard. However, this venture has reportedly faced difficulties, including staffing challenges attributed to Meghan’s management style. This mirrors previous issues faced by the couple, where staff turnover was high, and accusations of a demanding work environment surfaced.

The couple’s media ventures, including their deals with Netflix and Spotify, are key components of their financial independence. Their Netflix documentary and Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” have both generated significant attention and controversy. These projects reflect their strategy to control their narrative and share their side of the story, but they also attract criticism and skepticism.

Critics argue that Harry and Meghan’s continuous focus on their grievances and security concerns keeps them tethered to the very institution they sought to leave behind. This paradox fuels media scrutiny and public debate over their true intentions and the impact of their actions on the royal family and public opinion.

Despite these challenges, Harry and Meghan continue to navigate their new roles outside the royal framework. They have embraced various philanthropic efforts and public appearances, aligning themselves with causes such as mental health, gender equality, and racial justice. These endeavors aim to redefine their public image and establish their legacy independently of the royal family.

Their relationship with the British press remains strained, marked by ongoing legal battles and a deep mistrust. This adversarial stance towards the media is a significant aspect of their post-royal life, influencing how they communicate and interact with the public.