Meghan Markle ‘banned’ from saying British word leaving royal fans astounded

In an intriguing and somewhat startling disclosure, it has come to light that Meghan Markle, during her final season on the legal drama “Suits” before her royal wedding to Prince Harry, was forbidden from using a specific word. The word in question was “poppycock,” a quaint British term meaning nonsense. This prohibition came directly from the Palace, according to Aaron Korsh, the creator of “Suits.”

Korsh explained that while writing the script, he intended for Meghan’s character, Rachel Zane, to use “poppycock” in a dialogue. However, the Palace intervened, expressing concern that the word might be manipulated or misinterpreted in an inappropriate way. To avoid any potential controversy, the word was substituted with “bulls***,” a more universally understood term in American vernacular.

This revelation has prompted varied reactions from royal enthusiasts and the general public alike. Some understand the Palace’s caution, acknowledging that the royal family’s image is meticulously managed and protected. Others, however, view the censorship as excessive, questioning why such an innocuous term would be deemed problematic.

The episode also sheds light on the broader scrutiny and constraints Meghan faced as she transitioned from her acting career to royal life. The interference from the Palace in her professional work on “Suits” exemplifies the level of control and influence exerted to safeguard the royal family’s reputation. This instance of censorship has become a symbol of the challenges Meghan encountered, balancing her established identity as an actress with her new role within the royal establishment.

Prince Harry has also touched upon Meghan’s departure from “Suits” in his memoir, “Spare.” He describes the period as challenging for Meghan, who had to leave behind a significant part of her life and career as she embraced her new duties as a member of the royal family. The incident with “poppycock” is just one of many adjustments Meghan had to make during this transitional phase.

The broader implications of this incident reflect the tightrope Meghan walked, trying to honor her commitments to her acting career while adhering to the expectations and regulations of the royal institution. It highlights the cultural and contextual differences Meghan had to navigate, given her American background and the British royal traditions she was integrating into.

Moreover, this instance of censorship, although minor, underscores the larger issue of control and autonomy that has been a recurring theme in Meghan and Harry’s narrative. Their move to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States was, in part, driven by a desire for greater freedom and a break from the restrictive protocols they faced as senior royals.

The public’s reaction to the revelation about the word “poppycock” encapsulates the divided opinions on Meghan and Harry’s journey. While some see the Palace’s intervention as a necessary measure to maintain decorum and prevent misinterpretation, others view it as an overreach that stifles individuality and expression. This debate continues to be a focal point in discussions about the couple’s relationship with the royal family and their quest for autonomy.

Ultimately, the anecdote about “poppycock” serves as a small but telling example of the larger dynamics at play in Meghan Markle’s transition from actress to duchess, highlighting the complexities and challenges inherent in merging a high-profile career with the stringent demands of royal life.