Queen’s shocking one-word Meghan Markle insult

The alleged revelation about the late Queen Elizabeth II referring to Meghan Markle as “evil” has sparked significant interest and speculation. According to a report from The Spectator, the Queen is said to have made this remark during a dinner party at Balmoral Castle just months before her passing.

This claim has emerged amidst a series of interviews and statements from individuals within the royal family’s inner circle, who have been sharing their perspectives on the ongoing tensions between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the rest of the royal household.

While the report has garnered attention due to the extraordinary nature of the alleged comment, it is crucial to approach such claims with caution and objectivity. The context and veracity of the statement remain uncertain, and it is essential to consider the potential motivations and biases of the sources involved.

Regardless of the accuracy of this specific allegation, the ongoing public discourse surrounding the royal family highlights the complex dynamics and challenges they face in navigating personal relationships, public perception, and the preservation of traditional values in a rapidly evolving societal landscape.

The alleged comments attributed to Queen Elizabeth II regarding Meghan Markle have sparked significant interest and discussion. According to a source cited by Kara Kennedy of The Spectator, the Queen purportedly described Meghan as “evil” and referred to Prince Harry’s marriage as a “complete catastrophe.” This revelation is particularly noteworthy given the Queen’s reputation for diplomacy and restraint.

The source claims that during a pre-dinner gathering, the Queen expressed regret about how the situation had unfolded, stating that she had only months left to live and seemed to view Meghan in an unfavorable light. The use of the word “evil” to describe Meghan is described as “out of character” for the Queen, who was known for her forgiving nature.

While these allegations have raised eyebrows, it is important to note that they originate from an unnamed source, and their veracity cannot be independently verified. However, the report suggests that there may have been tensions within the royal family regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s departure.

It is worth mentioning that there have been other voices, described as having “the crispest of vowels and plummiest of accents,” who have also expressed criticism towards the Sussexes, further fueling the ongoing public discourse surrounding their relationship with the royal family.

This week, Lord Nicholas Soames, a close friend of King Charles III and Winston Churchill’s grandson, expressed his views on Prince Harry’s memoir “Spare” in a radio interview. He described Harry’s decision to write the tell-all book as “the cruellest” behavior, stating that if his own son did something similar, it would be a terrible blow.

Lord Soames told Times Radio, “Well, in respect of Prince Harry, I just think it’s the most tragic. I mean, I can’t put myself in the position where my own son, if he did something like that to me, it would just be the cruellest and one would mind. Of course, the King was very, very sad, tragic … it was a terrible blow.”

Additionally, the Queen’s closest friend, Fiona Shelburne, the Marchioness of Lansdowne, spoke on the record about Camilla, the Queen Consort, to the Sunday Times. This is something she would have done only with explicit approval from Camilla herself.

When asked about “Spare” and Harry’s attacks on his stepmother, the Marchioness did not shy away from sharing Camilla’s reaction, saying, “Of course it bothers her, of course it hurts. But she doesn’t let it get to her. Her philosophy is always, ‘Don’t make a thing of it and it will settle down – least said, soonest mended.'”

These statements from Lord Soames and the Marchioness of Lansdowne provide insights into the reactions of King Charles III and Camilla regarding Prince Harry’s controversial memoir.

The recent revelations from multiple insiders close to the British royal family regarding the ongoing rift between Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, and the rest of the royals, particularly King Charles III and Queen Camilla, have shed light on the palace’s perspective. Within a short span of weeks, we have heard from three sources – two named and one anonymous – who have been privy to the inner workings of the House of Windsor, each presenting the King and Queen’s side of the story in the ongoing “Sussex civil war.”

This sequence of events raises questions about whether it is merely a coincidence or a coordinated effort, perhaps a strategic campaign by the palace to defend the monarch and his wife, who have faced significant challenges in recent times and are constrained by the traditional silence expected of the sovereign.

When Prince Harry’s memoir “Spare” was released in January, Buckingham Palace refrained from issuing a point-by-point rebuttal, as such a response would be uncharacteristic for the monarchy. King Charles and Queen Camilla had little choice but to take the high road and hope that their dignified silence would be perceived positively.

However, the comments from the Marchioness of Lansdowne and Lord Soames suggest that the Duke of Sussex’s book deeply affected his father and stepmother emotionally. Even those about to be anointed in a sacred ceremony can have their feelings profoundly hurt and seek solace in private moments.

These insider accounts provide a rare glimpse into the royal family’s perspective on the ongoing tensions, offering insight into the emotional toll the situation has taken on the King and Queen, despite their public composure.

The ongoing tensions between Prince William and Prince Harry following the release of Harry’s memoir have been a subject of intense speculation and discussion. Several reports suggest that Prince William has been expressing his frustrations and feelings of betrayal through unnamed friends or sources close to him.

According to Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast, he has been privy to insights from individuals claiming to be friends or associates of Prince William. These sources have reportedly conveyed the Prince of Wales’s explosive anger and a sense of utter betrayal by his brother’s actions.

In January, one such friend allegedly stated that it was “impossible to exaggerate the extent of [William’s] contempt for Harry and Meghan now,” adding that William “absolutely hates them.” More recently, another friend purportedly said, “William will never trust Harry again. How could he? The truth is William absolutely hates Harry now and will never forgive him for the damage he has done to the family.”

While it is essential to maintain a healthy dose of skepticism regarding unverified claims, particularly those attributed to anonymous sources, the consistency in the reported sentiments from Prince William’s inner circle suggests a deep rift between the brothers.

However, it is crucial to approach such sensitive matters with objectivity and caution, as the alleged comments, if true, could further exacerbate the already strained relationship between the royal siblings.

The recent interviews given by friends of Charles and Camilla offer an insightful perspective on the ongoing rift within the royal family. Notably, these individuals have broken their long-standing silence, not to express remorse or suggest that Charles is actively seeking reconciliation with Harry, but rather to portray the King and Queen as victims who have suffered from Harry’s outbursts.

These interviews frame the narrative in a way that casts Charles and Camilla as the aggrieved parties, without any hint of contrition or willingness to engage in negotiations with Harry. This stance suggests a hardening of positions on both sides.

As Harry prepares to make a brief appearance in the UK for the coronation, one of the biggest uncertainties revolves around the reception he might receive from the King – whether it will be conciliatory or an outright cold shoulder.

Interestingly, on the day of the coronation itself, the Marchioness of Lansdowne, who was named as one of Camilla’s two ‘Queen’s Companions’ after defending her in a recent interview, will make history by attending the ceremony. This appointment speaks volumes about the allegiances being formed within the royal circle.

Overall, these developments provide an informative glimpse into the dynamics at play, highlighting the entrenched positions and the potential challenges that lie ahead in mending the familial rift.