Why ‘angry’ Kate Middleton ‘refused’ to curtsy to Queen Camilla at coronation

The royal family’s dynamics and relationships have been a subject of public interest, particularly surrounding the recent coronation of King Charles III. According to royal biographer Tom Bower, the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton, was reportedly displeased with the guest list arrangements for the coronation ceremony on May 6.

Bower claimed that Middleton was “angry” with the newly crowned Queen Camilla over the disparity in the number of guests each was allowed to invite. While the Princess of Wales could only invite four of her family members, Camilla had 20 guests present. This alleged discrepancy in treatment reportedly led to tensions, with Bower suggesting that Middleton refused to curtsy for the monarch as she left Westminster Abbey.

Furthermore, Bower revealed that individuals who played a role in reshaping Camilla’s public image from being the king’s mistress to becoming the queen were also excluded from the high-profile event.

It is important to note that these claims have not been officially confirmed or denied by the royal family or their representatives. The Post reached out to the Princess of Wales and Buckingham Palace for comment but did not receive a response at the time of reporting.

The author revealed that the individuals who played a crucial role in reshaping Camilla’s image from being the king’s mistress to becoming the queen were surprisingly excluded from the high-profile coronation event. This revelation was accompanied by a photograph from Yui Mok, Pool via AP.

Bower provided further insights, stating, “Camilla brought 20 Parker Bowleses to the coronation, and there were four Middletons.” He later confirmed that both of Middleton’s siblings were not permitted to bring their partners to the event.

Bower continued, “If you look at the coronation footage, as the king and queen leave the thrones and head for the exit of Westminster Abbey, you’ll see that everyone bows and curtsies to the king, but no one moves a limb or a muscle when Camilla passes.”

He attributed this behavior to the fact that “they were angry with Camilla,” implying a potential rift or dissatisfaction among certain individuals regarding her presence at the coronation.

The recent comments by biographer Tom Bower on a television show have shed light on some intriguing details surrounding the guest list for King Charles III’s coronation. According to Bower, Camilla brought 20 members of her family, the Parker Bowleses, while Kate Middleton’s siblings were not permitted to bring their partners, despite the Middletons being present.

Bower further revealed that this decision caused palpable anger among those excluded, including individuals who had played a role in helping Camilla secure the crown. He claimed that Kate and William were also displeased with the situation, and this resentment permeated through the congregation seated near the throne at Westminster Abbey.

These revelations provide an informative glimpse into the dynamics and potential tensions that may have existed behind the scenes of the highly anticipated coronation ceremony. Bower’s insights offer a rare perspective on the intricate considerations and potential conflicts that can arise when curating guest lists for such significant royal events.

The tension between Kate Middleton and Queen Camilla was evident during the coronation events, according to royal biographer Tom Bower. He noted that Kate did not curtsy to Camilla, a sign of disrespect, and that Prince William omitted any mention of Camilla in his speech at the coronation concert. Bower described the anger towards the monarch as palpable throughout Westminster Abbey.

Additionally, Bower claimed that the coronation took a toll on Camilla, stating that in the weeks leading up to the event, she appeared exhausted and showed signs of aging. He suggested that the entire coronation process had left Camilla worn out. These observations highlight the potential strain in the royal family’s dynamics and the physical demands of such a high-profile event.

The recent comments by royal biographer Hilary Bower shed light on the alleged strain between Queen Camilla and members of the royal family. Bower suggested that Camilla’s exhaustion might be contributing to the reported tensions. This is not the first time the new queen has faced accusations of distancing herself from others.

Royal expert Christopher Andersen claimed on Wednesday that Camilla has further alienated Prince Harry from his father, King Charles III. According to Andersen, the author of “King: The Life of Charles III,” Camilla has been using the argument that Harry and Meghan are no longer working royals as a justification for isolating Charles from his younger son.

Andersen stated, “I think every time the king considers handing Harry an olive branch, Camilla makes sure Charles is reminded of all the terrible things written about her in ‘Spare,’ Harry’s memoir that was published earlier this year.” These claims suggest ongoing tensions within the royal family, with Camilla allegedly playing a role in exacerbating the rift between Charles and Harry.